stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

Leviticus 20:13:

If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Nice try, Colbert.

Leviticus was written approximately 1400 years before Jesus’ birth.

Nice try, artemispotter.

Old Testament =/= New Testament. Seriously. Also, Leviticus also commands you to learn the Torah, which, if you’re getting Old and New confused, you clearly haven’t.

Not to mention the other ridiculous laws in Leviticus (and Deuteronomy, as well), including the following:

  • No mixing of different types of fabric
  • No having sex with a woman on her period
  • Curse your mother or father? You must be killed
  • Disabled people cannot worship God 
  • Stubborn children should be stoned.

So…. still want to argue how valid the OT is?

Also, in the Bible!=Jesus said it, anyway.  Even in the NT, there are a lot of people who aren’t Jesus giving their opinions.

Truth.  

Only if the words are in red (in many translations) does it mean that Jesus said it.

FWIW, the apostle Paul and I would not have been friends.  Mortal enemies is more like it.

Hey, guys, remember that one time when Jesus declared Levitican law irrelevant?

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.

-Hebrews 7:18-19.

Having been Jewish for, you know, ever, I am endlessly amused at the Christian Right’s reliance on Leviticus. Even I, who didn’t understand the theological difference between Catholics and Protestants until I took a course on Christianity in college, knew that Jesus was totes anti-Leviticus.

Seriously, people…

Ugh thank you. Fellow Christian here. I’ve literally NEVER understood this logic. “hey guys let’s pick one arbitrary part of leviticus to harp on and ignore the fact that 99% of the new testament explicitly tells us the old covenants/laws no longer hold true”

(Source: drunkonstephen)


553,169 notes
tagged as: colbert. jesus. homosexuality. bible.
reblogged from leahblaine
originally posted by drunkonstephen

  1. demonsabre reblogged this from getnerdywithme
  2. myovada reblogged this from toomanyfandomssolittletime
  3. getnerdywithme reblogged this from book-browser
  4. soigalboigahs reblogged this from yiffprincethethird
  5. random-soliloquies reblogged this from honeyed-rose
  6. honeyed-rose reblogged this from saltysalmonella and added:
    The old laws were replaced with new ones. Well, basically one new one. Basically, be nice to each other. That’s it....
  7. thats-what-the-instructions-say reblogged this from saltysalmonella
  8. zadea reblogged this from aestas-lupus
  9. aestas-lupus reblogged this from bartramburk
  10. witheredr0se reblogged this from lillyhasatumblr
  11. empressrarapo reblogged this from psychophancy
  12. austindeangreen reblogged this from 3lectric-soul
  13. suitofcards reblogged this from hemuset
  14. davehollywood reblogged this from yaoislave and added:
    Yes
  15. blackfox21 reblogged this from doingnunsinthebuttforsatan
  16. doingnunsinthebuttforsatan reblogged this from dantelupine and added:
    Actually homosexuality is mentioned as a sin more times in the new testament than in the old, such as 1 corinthians 6:9...
  17. k3ntehgr8t reblogged this from feelinghomesick
  18. coryn189 reblogged this from yiffprincethethird
  19. hemuset reblogged this from dantelupine
  20. 3lectric-soul reblogged this from lillyhasatumblr
  21. dantelupine reblogged this from yiffprincethethird
  22. yiffprincethethird reblogged this from larimarcove
  23. boundlessalpha reblogged this from larimarcove
  24. larimarcove reblogged this from crimsonseeker